For an actively managed small-cap fund, 18 years is not a short-term phase — it is a full market cycle and a complete test of a fund manager’s skill. In theory, a fund operating in the small-cap segment should generate clear alpha over such a long period, especially while taking higher risk and charging active management fees.
However, after nearly two decades, the ICICI Prudential Small Cap Fund finds itself in an uncomfortable position: its long-term returns remain close to its own benchmark and not dramatically ahead of even the Nifty 50. This immediately raises a serious question — if a fund is taking small-cap level risk, running an active strategy, and charging higher fees, why does its performance look so similar to an index?
This is not a buy or sell recommendation. This is a data-driven reality check.
18 Years Is More Than Enough Time to Prove Alpha
The ICICI Prudential Small Cap Fund was launched in 2007. That means it has survived the global financial crisis, multiple Indian market cycles, COVID, geopolitical shocks, and several bull and bear phases.
Eighteen years is not luck.
Eighteen years is not timing.
Eighteen years is pure performance.
In the mutual fund world, anything beyond 10–12 years is considered a strong sample size. At 18 years, there is no excuse left for “market conditions” or “temporary underperformance”. The data is mature. The verdict should be clear.
Yet, the long-term CAGR of ICICI Prudential Small Cap Fund is roughly around 12–13%, which is only marginally higher than its benchmark and not meaningfully better than even the Nifty 50.
This is the core problem.
A small-cap fund is supposed to deliver outperformance, not just participation.
Small-Cap Risk, But Large-Cap Style Returns?
Small-cap funds exist for one reason: higher risk in exchange for higher returns. That is the entire trade-off. Investors accept volatility because they expect superior long-term wealth creation.
But when a small-cap fund delivers returns that are only 1–2% above its benchmark and barely ahead of a large-cap index like Nifty 50, the entire logic collapses.
So the real question becomes brutal but fair:
Why should an investor take small-cap level risk if the outcome looks like a large-cap fund?
Why pay active management fees if the result is index-like?
Why accept deeper drawdowns if the long-term reward is average?
This is not underperformance in one bad year. This is structural mediocrity over 18 years.
Benchmark Hugging: The Silent Problem in Active Funds
One of the biggest hidden issues in Indian mutual funds is something called benchmark hugging.
It means the fund claims to be active, but in reality behaves very close to its index. The portfolio moves like the benchmark, the returns look like the benchmark, and the risk profile is also similar — but the investor still pays higher fees.
The long-term data of ICICI Prudential Small Cap Fund fits this pattern uncomfortably well.
It is not a disaster.
It is not a failure.
But it is also not what active investing promises.
And that middle zone is the most dangerous zone — because it quietly transfers risk from fund house to investor, without delivering real alpha.
The AUM Question Nobody Talks About
Here is a point most investors ignore, but professionals never do.
After 18 years, the AUM of ICICI Prudential Small Cap Fund is still around ₹8,000 crore.
This is surprisingly low for:
- A fund backed by one of India’s biggest AMCs.
- A category (small-cap) that has seen massive investor interest.
- A fund that has existed for nearly two decades.
In the mutual fund industry, capital follows performance.
When a fund consistently delivers strong alpha, AUM explodes automatically.
The fact that ICICI Prudential Small Cap Fund has not attracted massive long-term capital tells its own story. The market may not say it loudly, but money always votes silently.
Performance Reality Check (Data Table)
Below is a simplified long-term comparison based on historical performance:
| Metric | ICICI Prudential Small Cap Fund | Nifty Small Cap 250 | Nifty 50 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Since Inception CAGR | ~12–13% | ~11–12% | ~10–11% |
| Risk Profile | Very High | Very High | Moderate |
| Volatility | High | High | Lower |
| Alpha Over Benchmark | ~1–2% | — | — |
| Active Fee | Yes | No | No |
This table shows the real contradiction:
Small-cap risk, but only marginal alpha.
That is not what active investing is supposed to look like.
SIP Reality: ICICI vs Nippon Case Study
A 15-year SIP comparison between ICICI Prudential Small Cap Fund and Nippon India Small Cap Fund shows another uncomfortable pattern.
Despite facing higher volatility and deeper drawdowns, Nippon India Small Cap Fund generated significantly higher long-term wealth compared to ICICI.
Even after tax adjustment, Nippon delivered a much larger final corpus, while ICICI remained far behind.
This proves an important point:
Both funds took similar category risk.
One created aggressive wealth.
The other delivered controlled mediocrity.
Risk was the same. Outcome was not.
If Performance Is Average, Where Is the Real Problem?
At this stage, the discussion becomes unavoidable.
If a fund underperforms its own category for nearly two decades, the issue is no longer market cycles. The issue is process.
And when process fails consistently, only two possibilities exist:
Either the strategy is flawed.
Or the fund management lacks edge.
In any performance-driven industry — sports, business, investing — sustained underperformance leads to accountability. But in mutual funds, investors are often told to remain patient indefinitely, even when the data no longer justifies that patience.
That is not discipline.
That is blind loyalty.
The Active Fee Trap
This is the most uncomfortable truth.
Investors in ICICI Prudential Small Cap Fund took:
- Higher volatility.
- Higher drawdowns.
- Higher emotional stress.
But in return, they received:
- Index-like returns.
- Marginal alpha.
- No clear performance edge.
This is the active fee trap.
You take passive results.
You pay active costs.
You carry active risk.
And over 18 years, that cost compounds massively.
Final Verdict: Data Speaks Louder Than Marketing
The ICICI Prudential Small Cap Fund is not a bad fund.
But it is also not a great active fund.
After 18 years:
- Returns are near benchmark.
- AUM remains modest.
- Alpha is weak.
- Risk-adjusted performance is questionable.
This is not what investors sign up for when they choose small-cap active funds.
Active investing is not about matching the index.
It is about beating it decisively.
And if a fund cannot do that in 18 years, the most honest question is no longer about the market — it is about the fund itself.
Disclaimer
This article is strictly for educational and informational purposes only. It is based on historical data and publicly available information. It does not constitute any investment advice, recommendation, or solicitation to buy or sell any mutual fund. Investors should consult a certified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
Why 98% Investors Fail to Build Wealth: The Psychology of Money in Investing
One thought on “Why Is ICICI Prudential Small Cap Fund Still Delivering Low Returns After 18 Years?”